SEVENS EMERGE FROM SOWER’S TRIPLES
This should not be happening.
I get the sense that I have opened a fortune cookie and
inside the little paper says, “Help, I am trapped in a cookie factory.”
There is so much of what I will call intelligence in these
number patterns. It cries out for
recognition. And indeed as I have
mentioned earlier, if we saw these number patterns being beamed at us from
outer space, we would immediately take it as a message from intelligent
aliens. That is, we would but not those
of us zoned out watching Fake News.
Let me start at the beginning. The Sower’s parables make mention of these
numbers: 100-60-30 and 30-60-100. Two Bible passages make mention of 70 x
7. In fact with application of the
Sower’s parables numbers, some number sets in the Bible and in other texts,
yield the 70 x 7 (http://cookies-and-tea.blogspot.com/p/how-to-use-sowers-parables-numbers.html
)
This post is not about the Bible but rather is math, easy
math.
Among the 1,000 three-digit numbers 0-999, there are 42 (7 x
6) three-digit numbers or ‘triples’ that yield a 70 x 7 with application of the
Sower’s parables numbers.
There are 20 triples which yield 490 (70 x 7) with application
left to right of 100-60-30
For example
411
4 x 100 = 400
1 x 60 = 60
1 x 30 = 30
Sum = 490 (70 x 7)
Here are the 20 “lefts” in ascending order (100 is on the
left), each produces 490
129, 137, 145, 153, 298, 403, 411, 548, 556, 564, 572, 580, 806,
814, 822, 830, 967, 975, 983, 991
There are 20 triples which yield 490 (70 x 7) with
application left to right of 30-60-100
For example
114
1 x 30 = 30
1 x 60 = 60
4 x 100 = 400
Sum = 490 (70 x 7)
Here are the 20 “rights” in ascending order (100 is on the
right), each produces 490
038, 085, 114, 199, 228, 275, 304, 351, 389, 418, 465, 541, 579,
608, 655, 731, 769, 845, 892, 921
Strangely, none of the 20 lefts or 20 rights is divisible by
7. Each left is the reverse of a right;
for example, 411 is the reverse of 114.
When a left is added to its reverse right, then the sum is
divisible by 7 in every case. Amazing. This should not be happening.
Example
114 + 411 = 525 (7 x 75)
For 6 of the 42 (1 in 7), the sum of a pair yields a factor
of 7^3.
There are two triples that are symmetrical, and sum to 490
with application of the Sower’s parable numbers. Both are divisible by 7.
161 and 959
The sum of the 42 triples is 22,211 (7 x 19 x 167), three
primes, factor of 7.
Now I put the lefts, rights, and symmetricals together in
one group of 42, in ascending order. I
apply the Sower’s numbers.
I take the first number, skip three, take a second number,
skip three; thus skip seven between sets.
Example set one
038, 137, 199
100 x 038 = 3,800
60 x 137 = 8220
30 x 199 = 5970
Sum of products = 17990 factor 70
30 x 038 = 1140
60 x 137 = 8220
100 x 199 = 19900
Sum of products = 29260 factor 70
In the following chart you can see that each set yields a
7-factor, alternating with a 70 x 7 factor in the following set. However, the sets that yield only a 7-factor
then yield a 70 x 7 by taking the difference of sums of products. So you
do ultimately get a 70 x 7 in each set
Example from set one
29260 minus 17990 = 11270 factor 70 x 7
(Where I say factor of ‘70’ I do realize I have added a
factor of 10. However, getting a 7 x 7
would have to be against the odds.)
Chart of 42 in ascending order
skip three between subsets (skip seven between sets)
038 038, 137,
199 17990 factor 70 29260 factor 70 diff 11270 factor 70 x 7
085
114
129
137
145
153
161
199 199, 304,
411 50470 factor 70 x 7 65310 factor
70
228
275
298
304
351
389
403
411 411, 548,
579 91350 factor 70 103110 factor 70 diff 11,760 factor 70 x 7
418
465
541
548
556
564
572
579 579, 731,
822 126420 factor 70 x 7 143430
factor 70
580
608
655
731
769
806
814
822 822, 921,
983 166950 factor 70 178220 factor 70 diff 11270 factor 70 x 7
830
845
892
921
959
967
975
983 983??
991
Very unusual to see a definite pattern of 70 x 7 emerging
from a substrate of triples that does not seem to foster such a relationship. Why is this happening?
All this is very similar to my discovery of the number
patterns coming out of the powers of two, supposedly an entirely different
substrate. Further below I have pasted
that finding.
There is no reason I can think of why 70 x 7 should be
spilling out of the powers of two with application of Sower’s parables numbers. So this should not be happening either. By putting 30-60-100 into the Gospel books,
was the author signaling he/she knew something about the nature of the
Universe?
Here I am thinking of the engravings on Pioneer, a NASA
space probe sent to the ‘edge of the solar system,’ with drawings signaling
that the probe’s builders knew something about science. But they did not realize that any aliens
would not be able to understand the drawings, very fortunately, because it
includes directions on how to reach Earth.
Who in the world would invite aliens to come visit? (Not real smart, y’all.)
I do enjoy examining the bars on my cage and hopefully, it
is not a prison but rather like a play pen for a beloved child of the
Divine. Hopefully, I am inside the cage
and not outside looking in on its Designer caught in his/her own creation like
the proverbial fortune cookie factory prisoner.
Am I surprised to find the Sower’s Sevens (70 x 7) emerging
from both the powers of two and from the 42 triples? More like delighted. I can already see that some patterns are repeated,
after all, the gοlden ratio
is repeated in both the five-pointed stαr
and in the Fιbonacci series.
I was looking at the 42 triples as part of examining
pi. I don’t know if Sower’s Sevens are
just decoration or are actually central to the Design (or maybe just nothing at
all). So far, pi does not appear to have
any pattern, it is just fairly evenly uneven.
Sort of like what we experience daily here strung between Yin and Yang. Perhaps I would need to know how to program a
computer to make progress with pi. The
image above (‘unevenness in pi’) is my unfinished effort to find a Sower’s
Sevens pattern in pi among triples and sets of 12, a pattern not yet
found. We hope that this Samsara is not
irrevocable and that the Designer has left itself an escape hatch, as an
eternity floundering in pi-place would be too long.
Update from May 9, 2015THE TRIANGLE’S POWERS OF TWO PRODUCE SOWER’S SEVENS
This may be what I’ve been looking for these many years!!! . . .
It shows perhaps, the origin of the biblical “seventy times seven” and the Sower’s numbers in the Gospel (100-60-30 and 30-60-100).
Just a reminder, the rows of the Pascal’s Triangle sum to increasing powers of 2.
These powers of 2 produce Sower’s Sevens. Here is how.
The leftmost column in the chart below shows, obviously, the powers of 2 in ascending order.
Each number in the second column is the sum of the number above and the number to the left.
The third column shows that each third value in the second column is evenly divisible by 7. It would seem that this pattern may continue with each seventh result of a seven-factor being instead 7-squared.
The fourth and fifth columns in the chart are the sum of products obtained by multiplying three consecutive values in the second column with Sower’s numbers (100-60-30 and then 30-60-100). For example, (15 x 100) + (31 x 60) + (63 x 30) = 5250 (factor of 70); and then (15 x 30) + (31 x 60) + (63 x 100) = 8610 (factor of 70). If the three consecutive values in the second column are selected so that the third value is the value evenly divisible by 7, then the sum of products will be evenly divisible by 70. It would seem that every seventh sum of products yields a biblical factor of seventy times seven.
The fifth column divided by the fourth column approaches an approximate golden ratio if you don’t mind rounding up to 1.618 (for example, quotient in bottom row is 1.6176471411150741660343138936826).
0
1 1
2 3
4 7 /7=1 490 (70 x 7) 910 (70)
8 15
16 31
32 63 /7=9 5250 (70) 8610 (70)
64 127
128 255
256 511 /7=73 43330 (70) 70210 (70)
512 1023
1024 2047
2048 4095 /7=585 347970 (70) 563010 (70 x 7)
4096 8191
8192 16383
16384 32767 /7=4681 2785090 (70) 4505410 (70)
32768 65535
65536 131071
131072 262143 /7=37449 22282050 (70) 36044610 (70)
262144 524287
524288 1048575
1048576 2097151 /7 x 7 =42799 178257730 (70) 288358210 (70)
2097152 4194303
4194304 8388607
8388608 16777215 /7=2396745 1426063170 (70 x 7) 2306867010 (70)
Posted December 30, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment