There are Sower’s Sevens in the US Constitution. There is even a whopping 7-cubed!
What are Sower’s Sevens?
These are a biblical “70 x 7” factor hidden in a document. With application of the Sower’s parables
numbers (100-60-30 and 30-60-100) to a number set in the document, using simple
arithmetic, the embedded sevens emerge.
I thought there might be Sower’s Sevens in the US
Constitution when I saw it had seven
articles and forty signers, both
seven and forty being favored numbers in the Bible.
The Constitution was signed on a date that contains four
sevens: the seventeenth day of September [seventh
month per root “sept”], in the year one thousand seven hundred and eighty-seven. Signed in the twelfth year of America’s
independence, both seven and twelve being favored numbers in the Bible.
But wouldn’t the date be just coincidental? Maybe not.
In Solution 2 below for the US Constitution, I explain how the date
contains Sower’s Sevens and has a result – 6,860 – which contains a whopping
7-cubed (70 x 7 x 7 x 2) and is same value as that in Pope Benedict’s
Compendium (side-bar Hidden Papal Sevens).
Without going through the history of all 40 signers of the
US Constitution, I would guess that few or none were Catholics, so what do they
have in common with Pope Benedict? A
love of scripture and the Sower’s Sevens in scripture?
Amazing that the US Constitution was approved by unanimous
consent of those present, per statement near signing date. There were also non-signing delegates and
only 12 of 13 states were represented.
So the number 40 was deliberately selected? Originally 70 delegates were appointed, 55
attended, 39 signed plus the signature of the secretary makes 40. Forty, 70, and 12 are favored numbers in the
Bible.
Is the US Constitution a “sacred text” and therefore a fit
subject for discussion on this blog? It
may not be a sacred text per se but it has sacred numbers.
Here are three solutions for finding Sower’s Sevens in the
US Constitution:
Solution 1
The algorithm is similar to other solutions (“7th century,”
“Popes,” and “Papal” in side-bar) where the number of items within formatting
serve as values to populate subsets.
Within the seven Articles and various sections of the US
Constitution, there are 24 clusters of paragraphs, not broken by any heading.
The trick is to realize that Article VII only has one
paragraph because the second paragraph is just a list of edits. It is not included in the Government Printing
Office version which numbers all paragraphs exceeding one.
Step by step
Determine how many paragraphs are in each of the 24 paragraph
clusters and arrange these values in the order they occur in the text into 3
subsets of 8 values each, and sum:
1, 5, 7, 2, 4, 2, 3, 18 = 42
8, 3, 8, 3, 1, 1, 1, 3 = 28
2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 1, 3, 1 = 14
Sum of sums = 84
Notice that all three sums have 7 as a factor, very unusual,
so a factor of 7 is guaranteed in the outcome.
But will there be a factor of 70 x 7?
The sums sum to 84 (12 x 7, both 12 and 7 being favored
numbers in the Bible).
Multiply by Sower’s parables numbers
100 x 42 = 4,200
60 x 28 = 1,680
30 x 14 = 420
Sum of products = 6,300; factors of 70 x 90
Reverse
30 x 42 = 1,260
60 x 28 = 1,680
100 x 14 = 1,400
Sum of products = 4,340; factors of 70 x 31 x 2
Taking the difference between sums of products has worked
for two Papal documents and it works here:
6,300 minus 4,340 = 1,960; factors of 70 x 7 x 4
Thus a biblical 70 x 7 is achieved.
Notice that 1,960 is half of 3,920, a factor in the Ezekiel
temple measurements, apostles names and appellations, and in loaves and fishes.
Solution 2
This puzzle is found in the date at the end of the US
Constitution, before the Amendments. The
date reads:
“done in Convention by
the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand
seven hundred and Eighty seven and
of the Independance of the United States of America the Twelfth”
Did you notice that some words have the first letter
capitalized? Did you further notice that
only some of the numbers have the first letter capitalized? I have bolded these numbers for you.
Step by step:
The three numbers are the three subsets to manipulate: 17, 80, 12
Usually I have found that ordinal numbers are supposed to be
ignored in a number set, but evidently, not here, as I get a spectacular
result.
Multiply by Sower’s parables numbers.
100 x 17 = 1,700
60 x 80 = 4,800
30 x 12 = 360
Sum of products = 6,860; factors of 70 x 7 x 7 x 2
7-cubed !!!
When I see the date in the US Constitution, with only some
first letters capitalized and I so easily pull out a seven-cubed along with the
70 x 7, how could that be anything other than deliberate on the part of the
document’s author? Maybe William Jackson
the secretary.
The author is correct that he is in the “Twelfth” year of
the Independence of the USA; however, only eleven years have elapsed (July 4,
1776 through September 17, 1787). But
his would be a common way of reckoning time.
Solution 3
When I notice there are 12 states represented and this value
is evenly divided by 3, and that there are a certain number of signatures per
state, this leads me to look for Sower’s Sevens in the signatures.
Step by step
I divide those values into three subsets as follows, and
sum. The trick is to add George Washington
to the Virginia signature group.
Delaware 5, Maryland 3, Virginia 3, North Carolina 3
Sum = 14
South Carolina 4, Georgia 2, New Hampshire 2, Massachusetts
2
Sum = 10
Connecticut 2, New York 1, New Jersey 4, Pennsylvania 8
Sum = 15
Total 39 signatures plus the secretary makes for 40
Next multiply by Sower’s parables numbers
100 x 14 = 1,400
60 x 10 = 600
30 x 15 = 450
Sum of products = 2,450; factor of 70 x 7 x 5
Is it possible that these grown men decided who amongst them
would sign the document based on how their signatures would form a puzzle that
would yield Sower’s Sevens? Hard to
believe grown men would do such.
However, I have heard that many of them were Freemasons and if secret sevens
were important to them (and of course I do not know Freemasonry secrets), then
yes, maybe they did get a kick out of putting hidden sevens into their writing
and into their signing. I’ll guess most
of the men had no idea why some were chosen to sign and others not, and as men
love to play at follow the leader, they simply assumed that the leaders knew
what they were doing.
How else would these framers of the Constitution be
organized other than through contacts in Freemasonry? They were spread out over many hundreds of
miles and while commerce did connect many over state lines, probably that would
be a secondary way of organizing. Their
religious denominations were diverse and not in communication with each
other. No women were present even to do
menial tasks, another clue it was a gathering of Freemasons.
Wikipedia (not authoritative) reports that one of the tasks
of William Jackson, secretary, was to destroy papers: “As the
Convention secretary, Jackson had a number of duties, including maintaining the
secrecy of the Convention's proceedings, keeping official minutes, and
destroying many of the proceedings' other records.” Oh.
Secrecy. Oh. If they were not doing secret Freemasonry
stuff, why would there be secrets? Were
they worried about British spies? Not
likely. Of course I can only guess at
why they wanted secrecy.
How would anyone learn about Sower’s Sevens? The same way I learned, by reading the Bible
and figuring out the numbers. I would
suppose that there are four groups today who know about what I call Sower’s
Sevens: some Jews, some at the Vatican,
some in Ιslam, and some in Freemasonry, based on my finding Sower’s Sevens in
various texts.
All these men know that there are many passages in the Bible
which are less than completely literal because the number sets are skewed to
embed sevens. But then, we all know, or
most of us know, that the Bible is less than completely literal as we don’t
believe in a talking donkey, a talking snake, or a patriarch who lives to be
969 years old.
What are the odds?
On this blog, I now have 33 examples of Sower’s Sevens in
various texts. What are the odds of getting a “70 x 7” as a factor?
The odds are 1 in 490, but since I add a factor of 10 in the process of doing
the arithmetic, the odds are 1 in 49. What are the odds of getting a “70
x 7” in 33 examples? The odds are 1 in 7^33 (one in seven to the 33rd
power) – astronomical.
Can a document that is the product of compromise, actually
contain Sower’s Sevens? Rather wouldn’t
it be a hodge-podge like most work that comes out of a committee? I am beginning to have my doubts about my
Sower’s Sevens, but it does seem that the Constitutional Convention was very
cohesive, having unanimous agreement to issue the Constitution, and there was
opportunity to insert sevens as only one man, William Jackson, was charged with
keeping the minutes. I assume he was
also the one who scribed the document onto 4 pieces of parchment in elegant
cursive, not an easy task when working with a quill pen. The scribe was likely the one to make
decisions about paragraph breaks.
When I see the same sums of products appearing in various
texts, and the same algorithms, I tend to assume this is a tradition among
certain groups of men, not a fluke or a coincidence.
Where to find 70 x 7 and 30-60-100 in the Bible:
Seven is a favored number in the Bible. The biblical “70
x 7” is found printed (not hidden) in Matthew 18:22 (footnote NRSV)
and also in Genesis 4:24. By the way, I believe that means seventy
times sevenfold (DRA), not 77 times.
The Sower’s Parables numbers can be found at: (1) Matthew
13:8 (100, 60, 30); (2) Matthew 13:23 (100, 60, 30); (3) Mark
4:8 (30, 60, 100); (4) Mark 4:20 (30, 60, 100); and (5) Luke 8:8
(100).
Link to official transcript of US Constitution
Link to Government Printing Office version with paragraphs
numbered
Link to page re non-signing delegates
Link to wiki page re William Jackson
Posted: July 4, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment